Officer, I was just charging the batteries because I'm a Greenie Nerd, really. 
Hahahaha.Officer, I was just charging the batteries because I'm a Greenie Nerd, really.![]()
I haven't actually cruised at 140 so I couldn't tell you. Every time I have hit 140 it was usually on my way up to a higher speed that I didn't get to maintain for long due to my exit coming up (basically it's hard to find too many places you can do that for very long). I have, however, cruised at 115 in sport and saw that the engine was charging the battery very rapidly. From what I can tell when you really push the car it will obviously use the electric motor to help you get up to a high speed, but once you're at the speed you want to be going, it'll start using the engine to recharge the battery. It seems the faster you are going, the more it's trying to recharge. Like i notice the car works more to recharge at 90 than it does at 80, and the needle, if I remember correctly, was far to the left when I was cruising at 115. I'll have to do more "research" on it though. "Officer, you're interrupting some very important product testing by pulling me over."140mph is scary fast.
Does both the gas engine and battery power the car at the same time at 140mph?
Go drive in West Texas on I-10 (between San Antonio and El Paso). DPS can't be everywhere.
Yea, hitting an animal at 160 would suck. My uncle, who was actually kind of my inspiration for fast driving as a kid, was up in Montana back with they had the "reasonable and prudent" speed limits. He was going 150 in his Lexus LS and hit a bird. The bird hit right on the driver A-pillar and went splat on the car like a bug.Had my GT-R up to 160 there for several minutes. Only thing that worried me was hitting an animal (and, of course, the cops).![]()
They were from Brake Performance. I got drilled and slotted rotors with ceramic pads if I remember correctly.Engine braking for the win!
@Hunter81 - What aftermarket rotors and pads were you using that warped so fast?
You made me curious. I checked around and from what I could find and it seems like the extra wear on the engine is marginal and engine braking is still recommended for maintaining vehicle control like when you're coming down a hill.Interesting how people in different forums think!
is it bad to use my paddle shifters to slow down like a manual.
Folks who don't value downshifting need to drive Colorado I-70, east of the Eisenhower Pass. That's about a 30 mile, and a decent 7% descent. It will fry your brakes (or break your brakes), unless you take a break to let your brakes cool. Or, you could simply downshift, and let that underhood air pump (engine) work for you. Bonus for hybrids: guaranteed full battery charge will be available at the bottom.You made me curious. I checked around and from what I could find and it seems like the extra wear on the engine is marginal and engine braking is still recommended for maintaining vehicle control like when you're coming down a hill.
I only do it though when I'm coming down from a really high speed since the car's kinetic energy increases as the square of your speed. So, maybe 2 times a month. (The brakes have to work 4 times as hard slowing a car down from 40 than they do slowing down one from 20 mph, and they have to work 49 times as hard slowing down a car from 140 mph!)
Beautiful country. I drove west on I-70 many years ago. I didn't pay much attention to mpg then, but I'm sure it was lousy(going uphill).Folks who don't value downshifting need to drive Colorado I-70, east of the Eisenhower Pass. That's about a 30 mile, and a decent 7% descent. It will fry your brakes (or break your brakes), unless you take a break to let your brakes cool. Or, you could simply downshift, and let that underhood air pump (engine) work for you. Bonus for hybrids: guaranteed full battery charge will be available at the bottom.
I wouldn't worry about it too much. The ware on the engine would be in the opposite side of the synchros than is worn by normal driving. It would ware some of the clutches a little more than just using the brakes (in theory), but I don't think it would be extreme enough to cause any concern. However, brakes are cheaper than transmissions so...I just use brakes unless it a situation like that mentioned in Denver.Interesting how people in different forums think!
is it bad to use my paddle shifters to slow down like a manual.
That's what I read too. The wear is on the opposite side of the teeth in the transmission. Engine braking all the time probably isn't a good idea, but for certain situations it sounds like it's a great way to spare brakes from damage from excessive heat.I wouldn't worry about it too much. The ware on the engine would be in the opposite side of the synchros than is worn by normal driving. It would ware some of the clutches a little more than just using the brakes (in theory), but I don't think it would be extreme enough to cause any concern. However, brakes are cheaper than transmissions so...I just use brakes unless it a situation like that mentioned in Denver.
Engine braking is the same as any other ICE car. However, the addition of regenerative braking adds another dimension. I often take advantage just by sliding the gearshift to the manual side. As a former 6MT driver, it seems more intuitive than using the paddles.How effective is the engine braking on our Hybrids?? I remember engine braking on my G37 coupe was like depressing the brake pedal by maybe 10%? Is really noticeable breaking at those speeds?