Much lower than the 5,891 units in November (-22.5%).
And then there's MB selling 8k E-classes at a ~$15k higher price point. It has to be a combination of strong product, deft marketing, and lease rates that essentially give the car away.Sales will fluctuate month to month. The Q50 still outsold what the G Sedan sold last year alone. BUT the IS did beat the Q50 last month, with 5400 units in December. I think Infiniti will be happy as long as the Q50 stays in the 4000-6000 range, which I think is very realistic and attainable.
But what I don't get, STILL, is how in the **** did BMW manage to sell 16k 3/4 Series! What's the transaction prices/lease deals on those things?
FYI, Q50 did not oversell the G sedan for the whole year (30,256 G units for 2013) which is irrelevant since it was selling only for a few months. Interestingly however, sales of G increased by 13.8% in December: 1460 vs 1283 in November while sales of Q declined by 22.4%: 4568 in December vs. 5891 in November.Sales will fluctuate month to month. The Q50 still outsold what the G Sedan sold last year alone. BUT the IS did beat the Q50 last month, with 5400 units in December. I think Infiniti will be happy as long as the Q50 stays in the 4000-6000 range, which I think is very realistic and attainable.
But what I don't get, STILL, is how in the **** did BMW manage to sell 16k 3/4 Series! What's the transaction prices/lease deals on those things?
And then there's MB selling 8k E-classes at a ~$15k higher price point. It has to be a combination of strong product, deft marketing, and lease rates that essentially give the car away.
Rich people want free stuff too.So he's a rich yuppie, lives in a huge house and needs Santa to deliver him a Q?!?!
Not many, in all likelihood.Plus he has to carry a bunch of crap for him and sew his pants? What yuppie would do that?!?!
Clearly- if they didn't stink, Infiniti would be in Lexus's position in the US market. The cars certainly don't stink. In fact, the parity from Lexus to Infiniti has existed from day one and exceeds that of even BMW and Mercedes.Many Infiniti commercials stink. period.
I completely and utterly agree. This is used by companies against our best interests every single day.We Americans are suckers for good marketing imo.
I traded a new M37s for the Q. The car was horrible in so many ways. It didn't represent the class it competes on. Not by a long shotequetefue- the E-class is one of my favorite cars. I wish that the M was so well-rounded and marketed so effectively.
I traded a new M37s for the Q. The car was horrible in so many ways. It didn't represent the class it competes on. Not by a long shot
On the flip side the cheaper Q is a way better car in so many more ways. Too unfortunate about the steering and intouch issues.
Maybe I should have made it more clear... I was comparing Dec 2012 to Dec 2013... obviously there's no way for the Q50 to outsell the G YTD when its been on sell for less than 6 months. And I really find it pointless to compare the increase of G sales month to month vs the Q50's decrease from last month. 13.8%(177) more people bought a G in Dec... but 4568 people decided to buy a Q50... over the G.FYI, Q50 did not oversell the G sedan for the whole year (30,256 G units for 2013) which is irrelevant since it was selling only for a few months. Interestingly however, sales of G increased by 13.8% in December: 1460 vs 1283 in November while sales of Q declined by 22.4%: 4568 in December vs. 5891 in November.