Infiniti Q50 Forum banner
81 - 100 of 207 Posts
They are all similar and look like they share DNA. I would have liked a more distinctive rear end like Audi or BMW. Nonetheless, it is a fine car and thats what its all about. Can't wait for mine.
 
Is the comparison the Q50 vs 335i OR Q50 Hybrid versus 335i???

Seems performance\price is more in line between the two.. Whereas the Q50 would be more in line with the 328i, no?
I believe it's been mentioned several times how the Q50 sits firmly in between the 328 and the 335 in terms of both output/performance and price
 
The is Kia's coming luxury sedan. The side view of the taillight is the same as the Q50.

Image
Hmmm, to my eyes that profile of the tail lights resemble several other cars out there and not inherently similar to the Q50. I think that's just a common design thread among many cars these days. It's not the shape that's important anymore, rather the pattern and brightness of the lights matter a bit more to me.

If the Cadenza was the sister to the Azera, this K900 looks to be the sister to the Genesis
 
:rolleyes: smdh! We all know how notorious Kia and Hyundai are with mimicking Japanase\German designs! (Benz,Q45, Bentley, etc...)
I wish the younger generation would realize that a lot of people have no idea what these acronyms mean(or maybe that's the idea!). Yes, I did look it up, but it's just one more annoyance of our modern "education."
 
I wish the younger generation would realize that a lot of people have no idea what these acronyms mean(or maybe that's the idea!). Yes, I did look it up, but it's just one more annoyance of our modern "education."
As you know, we have to adapt to these things over time.

I don't know if it has anything to do with a "younger" generation--rather, it has more to do with one's own adoption and familiarity with the internet and technology age of communication and social education. Those who have not fully immersed themselves in that communication might feel the frustration of experiencing a bit of a learning period. One may interpret this as an annoyance. :p
 
The engine in the 335i is out of this world. So is the Audi S4's engine. I think only the hybrid Q50 can keep up with those 2 in terms of raw HP and torque.

No way the gasser can keep up.
 
As you know, we have to adapt to these things over time.

I don't know if it has anything to do with a "younger" generation--rather, it has more to do with one's own adoption and familiarity with the internet and technology age of communication and social education. Those who have not fully immersed themselves in that communication might feel the frustration of experiencing a bit of a learning period. One may interpret this as an annoyance. :p

Of course you have a point, but having been in the classroom with teenagers for 36 years, I've seen that many these days view learning proper English(spelling grammar, syntax) as an annoyance. :( I know that we've been down this road before, but it still is annoying to read someone's post and not understand it, either because of poor English skills or their reliance on texting communication. My generation was taught that it was the WRITER'S responsibility to make his thoughts clear. Just to be clear, I have no problem with looking up new words and concepts - it's called learning - and asking for help when I still don't understand something. Those who have been here a while KNOW that about me. I would just like to be able to read a post without having to figure out what's been said.
 
The engine in the 335i is out of this world. So is the Audi S4's engine. I think only the hybrid Q50 can keep up with those 2 in terms of raw HP and torque.

No way the gasser can keep up.
Sure...if you are only talking about 0-60 and a 1/4 mile run. The Q50 gasser is definately out matched over the same distances if the 335i and S4 have tunes. This is all considered if the performance is measured from a dig.

And yes, 0-60 and the 1/4 mile run are our standard measurements for a car's performance; however, it does not always translate into real world applications. At highway speeds, the 335i and S4 loses their torque advantages over the Q50 gasser and it truly becomes a driver's race.

I can't speak for the S4 personally, but I have on several occasions outran 335i's (without a tune) in my G37 coupe.

R&T measured the performance up to 130 mph...guess who comes out on top?

The Sweet Science: IS350 F-Sport v. BMW 335i v ATS V6 v Q50 - R&T Comparison - Road & Track
 
Q602B, I'm pretty sure the 335i has a better torque curve.
It puts out 300+ at a pretty low RPM.
Isn't this why it has such a good 0-60.
The torque cuve and it has the best tranny.
 
The dual clutch in the S4 and the ZF 8 speed in the 335i is MILES better than the Infiniti 7 speed tranny.

The S4 and 335i will trash a gas Q50S in a 0-60, 1/4 mile, or any higher speed race. No doubt in my mind about it.

The Q50S Hybrid will keep up but even then I am doubtful. The 7 speed auto isn't as slick as the DCT or the ZF 8 speed transmission in the German competition. On top of that, by the time you get up to speed, the battery in the Hybrid will have drained.
 
Absolutely agree with all the points you've made Chris...

My personal experiences, on the other hand, have been at highway speeds (50-70 mph) and not from a dig.
 
Q602B, I'm pretty sure the 335i has a better torque curve.
It puts out 300+ at a pretty low RPM.
Isn't this why it has such a good 0-60.
The torque cuve and it has the best tranny.
Andrew,

I have very little knowledge about the torque/hp science. All I know is from reading the rags, and other forums. Hopefully, someone else in the forum could better speak to that.

You are right tho; the 335i has its 300 lb/ft of torque available at 1200 rpm, which is absolutely ridiculous. BMW is known for its awesome transmission, so yeah, it is able to get the tq/hp from the crank with minimal power loss. Thus, this translates to its great 0-60 times; throw in the tunes, it could almost outrun the M3 to 60.

However, my understanding is, the 335i torque goes flat in 5th gear. This is about the time the VQHR37 comes into its own.
 
335

Andrew,

I have very little knowledge about the torque/hp science. All I know is from reading the rags, and other forums. Hopefully, someone else in the forum could better speak to that.

You are right tho; the 335i has its 300 lb/ft of torque available at 1200 rpm, which is absolutely ridiculous. BMW is known for its awesome transmission, so yeah, it is able to get the tq/hp from the crank with minimal power loss. Thus, this translates to its great 0-60 times; throw in the tunes, it could almost outrun the M3 to 60.

However, my understanding is, the 335i torque goes flat in 5th gear. This is about the time the VQHR37 comes into its own.
they are almost like 17-20k difference, for a gas q50s premium n and fully loaded 335 xdrive plus m package so for the price it's fair but when it comes to reliability and maintence cost we should all know what's up haha:D plus when the 335 is dyno it has way more than 300 hp n 300 torque at the wheel, them germans are all humble on the numbers lol!
 
Price difference is not $17k-20k. More like $7K-9k
Well...Yes and no.

If you compare a base model Q50S RWD, I believe it's around $44k.
If you compare a fully loaded 335xi M-Sport, I believe it's around $62k.

I think this is how the math was calculated by yougotrice, however it ultimately creates a bad comparison in this case.

A better comparison would be to compare a fully loaded Q50S Hybrid AWD, which is around $56k.

So I guess both of you are right, depending on how you look at. :eek:
 
81 - 100 of 207 Posts